|
|
Post by fantomas82790 on May 13, 2006 19:21:01 GMT
What match are you writing, B_L, that's making things so difficult for you? New Breed vs Patton/McMahon. Patton's virtually impossible to write for, and Mcmahon's not so easy either. Thank you, thank you very much. I take pride in the fact that I made an unwritable character. (Runs off and sobs like a little bitch) |
|
|
|
Post by fantomas82790 on May 13, 2006 19:24:03 GMT
Oh and BL, after you're done writing the math, I'll go more in depth with patton, if it would help ya out.
|
|
|
|
Post by Boricua on May 13, 2006 19:26:02 GMT
Hmmm . . . that's kind of interesting. How so?  That's the main reason why. Also of note is that he's got all power finishers, yet weighs as much as Paul London. |
|
|
|
Post by fantomas82790 on May 13, 2006 19:27:53 GMT
Hmmm . . . that's kind of interesting. How so? That's the main reason why. Also of note is that he's got all power finishers, yet weighs as much as Paul London. Well, to be fair, he was a general... But I'll fix that up dude, don't worry. |
|
|
|
Post by President Skroob on May 13, 2006 19:29:08 GMT
That's the main reason why. Also of note is that he's got all power finishers, yet weighs as much as Paul London. Well, to be fair, he was a general... But I'll fix that up dude, don't worry. But a cruiserweight won't have all power moves for finishers. |
|
|
|
Post by +Donald $. Carlos+ on May 13, 2006 19:31:58 GMT
Hmmm . . . that's kind of interesting. How so? That's the main reason why. Also of note is that he's got all power finishers, yet weighs as much as Paul London. Now I see your dilemma, Boricua . . . & I will pray for you, in the future.  |
|
|
|
Post by fantomas82790 on May 13, 2006 19:32:23 GMT
Well, to be fair, he was a general... But I'll fix that up dude, don't worry. But a cruiserweight won't have all power moves for finishers. Honestly, I thought I originaly put him at 220 lbs, not 200. So I changed his weight. I also changed his favorite moves from all of them, to about 5. |
|
|
|
Post by Boricua on May 13, 2006 19:51:21 GMT
That's a start, but not much better.
No need to make him taller, but I'll let you change it to 220 since that's what you originally meant to put.
At 220-225 pounds, a power finisher is still horribly unrealistic. Let's take a look at some of the people who've used the chokeslam:
The Undertaker: 6'8" 305 lbs
Kane: 6'10" 320 lbs
Big Show: 7'1" 508 lbs
Sid: 6'9" 300 lbs
Notice a pattern? So rather than completely alter his dimensions, why not just alter his style.
Which brings me to the next point: you've now changed him to wrestle an "aggressive, roughneck" style, but also "technical". This is also confusing to writers, as we can't really see where he's coming from, and makes him seem all over the place. This is actually a trap I think alot of guys fall into
For a bunch of guys, I see "technical" listed alongside their primary style. I think this is done out of concern that there guy might be written as a bad worker. Let me assure you: we will NOT hold it against you if your guy doesn't wrestle a technical style. Mick Foley, The Rock, Vader, and Stan Hansen didn't wrestle highly technical styles, yet are all generally regarded as good workers. It's not your style, it's how you make it work for you.
|
|
|
|
Post by fantomas82790 on May 13, 2006 19:56:56 GMT
That's a start, but not much better. No need to make him taller, but I'll let you change it to 220 since that's what you originally meant to put. At 220-225 pounds, a power finisher is still horribly unrealistic. Let's take a look at some of the people who've used the chokeslam: The Undertaker: 6'8" 305 lbs Kane: 6'10" 320 lbs Big Show: 7'1" 508 lbs Sid: 6'9" 300 lbs Notice a pattern? So rather than completely alter his dimensions, why not just alter his style. Which brings me to the next point: you've now changed him to wrestle an "aggressive, roughneck" style, but also "technical". This is also confusing to writers, as we can't really see where he's coming from, and makes him seem all over the place. This is actually a trap I think alot of guys fall into For a bunch of guys, I see "technical" listed alongside their primary style. I think this is done out of concern that there guy might be written as a bad worker. Let me assure you: we will NOT hold it against you if your guy doesn't wrestle a technical style. Mick Foley, The Rock, Vader, and Stan Hansen didn't wrestle highly technical styles, yet are all generally regarded as good workers. It's not your style, it's how you make it work for you. Yeah, that's why I put technical there. To tell the truth, I am in love with the chokeslam, it maybe(other than the Angle Slam) my favorite move ever. But for you BL, I'll change it up.(Wait, can I have the Angle Slam?) |
|
|
|
Post by Boricua on May 13, 2006 19:58:58 GMT
You can as long as you give it an original name. For the record, it's actually a Saito or teardrop Suplex.
|
|
|
|
Post by fantomas82790 on May 13, 2006 20:02:19 GMT
I called it D-Day.
|
|
|
|
Post by +Donald $. Carlos+ on May 13, 2006 20:10:07 GMT
I quite like the name "Teardrop Suplex". Not sure why . . . but it does sound cool. |
|
|
|
Post by fantomas82790 on May 13, 2006 20:11:31 GMT
I quite like the name "Teardrop Suplex". Not sure why . . . but it does sound cool. I do to, but uhh, I was really just trying to keep in with the Army theme. |
|
|
|
Post by Boricua on May 13, 2006 20:13:10 GMT
Yeah D-Day's a good choice.
|
|
|
|
Post by +Donald $. Carlos+ on May 13, 2006 20:13:41 GMT
I quite like the name "Teardrop Suplex". Not sure why . . . but it does sound cool. I do to, but uhh, I was really just trying to keep in with the Army theme. I understand that, Pearson . . . it was just a general (no pun intended) comment. |
|
|
|
Post by fantomas82790 on May 13, 2006 20:14:55 GMT
I do to, but uhh, I was really just trying to keep in with the Army theme. I understand that, Pearson . . . it was just a general (no pun intended) comment. HA HA HA. Just making sure. And jsut call me Bo, everyone else does(or they should) |
|
|
|
Post by +Donald $. Carlos+ on May 13, 2006 20:17:18 GMT
I understand that, Pearson . . . it was just a general (no pun intended) comment. HA HA HA. Just making sure. And jsut call me Bo, everyone else does(or they should) Will do . . . . . . Pearson.  |
|
|
|
Post by fantomas82790 on May 13, 2006 20:18:56 GMT
HA HA HA. Just making sure. And jsut call me Bo, everyone else does(or they should) Will do . . . . . . Pearson. Don, if you do that again, something so severe will happen to you, it's not even funny. |
|
|
|
Post by +Donald $. Carlos+ on May 13, 2006 20:20:37 GMT
Will do . . . . . . Pearson. Don, if you do that again, something so severe will happen to you, it's not even funny. Like what . . . . . . Pearson? |
|
|
|
Post by fantomas82790 on May 13, 2006 20:22:18 GMT
Don, if you do that again, something so severe will happen to you, it's not even funny. Like what . . . . . . Pearson? Trish Stratus was impregnated with Mike Patton's sperm. This was kept quiet, due to Mike Patton's amazing ability to keep shit about him out of the papers. That's just the beginning I have for you. |
|
